Righteousness & Art.

Righteousness leads to the undeniably true meaning that enters human awareness, from which follows all forms of art, as it builds all possible pictures of conscious states, and righteousness is always the origin of distinction.
Art is the undeniably new meaning that enters human awareness, from there follows all current ideas, as it builds from the certain and uncertain, from the right and the wrong, and art always leads the way.

God => righteousness => art => all ideas & actions

Therefore, righteousness leads to an eternity of new experiences...

It now seems reasonable to ask if we truely know where righteousness comes from?

Note that unrighteous people, just as righteous people, also do amazing and wonderful art, because they experience their state within the same kind of knowledge about righteousness. This is undeniably clear when we experience any and all art, just as much as the conclusion of unrighteousness and righteousness are intuitively clear.

The desaster caused by the anti-nuclear lobbyists!

The fact that climate change supporters actively undermined the development of next generation nuclear energy, since the 1960s already, is most probably the single biggest reason why world economies are still fossil fuel dependent... It could have been much different already, were it not for the toxic anti-nuclear propaganda!

Which brings me to distrust the current stance on why there might be critical issues with our readiness for possible severe climate phenomenon - a fact that overshadows the question about "who did it".

The anti-nuclear lobbying should take full responsibility of the current "fossil fuel burning psychosis" of modern economies - Guess what? It has always been Greenpeace!

P.S. With abundant nuclear energy the number of new and clean environment improving industries could have given us economies capable of sustaining all life... (... including the millions of humans killed through abortion as well as all the species on the brink of extinction). To list a few:
* Large scale desalination for residential human consumption & industry consumption as well as contained vertical commercial farming
* Sulphur (and other polutant) capturing and neutralisation for metallurgical processes, including cement manufacturing and many other poluting industries
* Value added processes to sustainably extract high value materials from fossil fuels i.e fossil fuels becomes high value fossil carbon materials instead of just being burned
* Space exploration will have enough energy to actually bring the necessary technology and materials into space.
* IT Server farms would have unlimited processing capability, bringing knowldge and solutions to all industries and societies.
* Large scale desaster efforts needs large scale energy supply to protect nature and life in general.
* Distributed energy supply can be sustainable with next generation modular nuclear technologies.
* Environmentally friendly cities and rural communities can be successfully energised.
* Successful protection of endangered ecological areas
* Concentrate commercial farming into smaller areas, including vertical farming, to allow nature to take back traditional farm lands

The list actually goes on and on... but none of these can be successfully achieved without abundant concentrated energy generation made possible by small modular nuclear energy.

The anti-energy lobbying has to answer for the psychotic strategy of forcing the world into severe energy deficiencies.

Modern sin-eaters!

If you ask me what kind of evidence do I have that Paganism is on the rise in modern society, then I would analyse the rise in the old pagan belief in sin-eaters. Sin-eaters have been those pariahs that bears the rejection that is supposed to be the salvation of a community. You could study the news and social media to see if there are any support for my claim.

But as a personal test to see your own need for sin-eaters ask yourself how easy do you find it to join the mob with their pitch forks and spades running after the one that is "causing" all your community's sorrows?

The post-pagan Christian world that we all know, in principle, knows that all of us are moral pariahs in need of individual salvation. But ask yourself how easy it is for you to ignore your own need for salvation while you consciously transfer your own evil to some poor sin-eater, that can actually do nothing to restore your rightiousness, but makes you feel better or forget your own depravity.

I know of no civilised society that can exist for long while they adhere to pagan beliefs. But I know that some modern civilisations have overcome paganism, generation after generation, as the rightiousness from God in Jesus Christ are revealed to each new generation.

Modern paganism is just as destructive as it was in the past.  Therefore, be careful about how you find peace and happiness in this age.

Liberalism exposed...something interesting!

Liberalism exposed...something interesting!

I think there might be a serious misunderstanding in the liberal interpretation of the human right of "freedom of association".

For the liberal it seems to imply that any individual has the right to join any group regardless of that group's identity.  Somehow the individual freedom always trumps the collective freedom of the individuals making up an existing group.  This seems to be a very suspect and even dangerous conviction because it usually ends in the attempted destruction of a specific identity unit/group by an outsider or outsiders.  This, in fact, is exactly the type of oppression that the universal human rights try to prevent and therefore the liberal’s misunderstanding needs to be corrected to ensure peaceful coexistence.

The consequences of this liberal misunderstanding is evident in modern societies struggling to create civilised associations/groups that is able to protect basic freedoms.  But before we delve deeper into some of the insights this “liberal misunderstanding” exposed, let us first try to find a proper understanding of the “freedom of association”.  The more accurate understanding of "the freedom of association" seems to be that any individual has the right to be freely assimilated into a group or not.  This assimilation is mostly a contractual and relational phenomenon between more that one individual. If assimilation fails it is usually because the individual or outsider group is unwilling to associate with the behaviour and values of the existing group.  There always remains the right to freely create a new association or group, but certainly not at the expense of the universal human rights of any other individual or its existing groups.  Therefore, changes in the nature of human associations have to be through consent and not forced.

Let us now investigate the impact of this “liberal misunderstanding” on modern nation states - the largest and most pronounced associations.  The typical nation state, as an association of people into a single identity, had its usefulness in the past, but the "liberal misunderstanding" (... of freedom of association), as described above, simply exposed the obvious flaw in modern nation states - Some might argue that the "liberal misunderstanding" caused the dissolution of nation states, but I think the end of nation states are in fact simply the outcome of resource and demographic realities - Sometimes this resource and demographic realities might in fact be orchestrated as "resource and demographic wars" and sometimes it might simply be the outcome of demographic progression and technology's proliferation through civilisations.

Modern nation states do not associate people based on their social needs anymore, modern nation states only associate people based on the most fundamental resource needs.  There are still nation states with very strong shared convictions, shared by the larger collective, but this is becoming the exception instead of the rule for obvious demographical and technological reasons.  It is now clear that various relational communities are the closest to the deep identity and association of people.  The problem is that the modern nation state does not really care about this level of relational identity. If freedom of association is true freedom, then individuals will be freely associating based on the deepest aspects of their identity and from that association they will take care of their needs.  The question about association is further answered if it is acknowledged that the modern world ensured that this level of relational existence of communities can be achieved by mobilising global/universal and not national resources.

The conclusion seems to be clear - the “liberal misunderstanding” of the freedom to associate was, among other reasons, because it misinterpreted the nature of association in national units with the association of community.  The liberal’s will to destroy the nation state, as a potential oppressor, might have blurred the liberal’s distinction between oppression and freedom of association.  Modern nation states have evolved into something else and the liberals and conservatives should acknowledge that freedom of association is therefore not defined by nation states anymore.  People will always associate on various levels and the resources available will influence the nature of these multi-layered associations.  What both the liberal and conservative must ask is if association must be forced or through consent?  To me the answer seems obvious.

As an ideological republican myself, I would prefer to, first, be a moral and soulful person and only then associate with my soul-community through all the deepest historical, cultural, art, aspirations to knowledge, social, political, economical convictions and love I have available.